Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Aesthetic Laser Treatment Injury Legal Actions

From Randolph STEM
Revision as of 00:30, 28 April 2025 by AshleyCasas423 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The outcomes of a research study developed to determine the occurrence of medical professional liability insurance claims originating from cutaneous laser surgical treatment performed by nonphysician drivers (NPOs") in the United States that was published online in the journal JAMA Dermatol on October 16, 2013 revealed a clear trend that demonstrates a remarkable boost in the variety of legal actions related to NPOs performance of laser surgical treatment." NPOs include...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The outcomes of a research study developed to determine the occurrence of medical professional liability insurance claims originating from cutaneous laser surgical treatment performed by nonphysician drivers (NPOs") in the United States that was published online in the journal JAMA Dermatol on October 16, 2013 revealed a clear trend that demonstrates a remarkable boost in the variety of legal actions related to NPOs performance of laser surgical treatment." NPOs include registered nurse practitioners, registered nurses, medical assistants, electrologists, and aestheticians. While just one-third of laser hair removal treatments were done by NPOs in 2012 (the staying two-thirds were executed by physicians), 85.7% of the laser hair elimination lawsuits from 2008 to 2012 included NPOs (from 2004 to 2012, 75.5% of the laser hair removal suits included a NPO; from 2010 to 2012, the percentage was 90.0%).

In 2011, 90.9% (10 out of 11) of the laser hair elimination injury claims involved NPOs, which the study's authors interpret as mirroring that some integral increased threat of injury exists with NPOs doing laser hair removal treatments.

Due to the fact that the procedure is carried out in a non-medical setting does not indicate that it is laser hair removal fda approved any much less high-risk than therapies in a hospital or surgical facility, just. As a matter of fact, laser hair elimination claims are on the surge, with suits filed throughout the country in support of those badly hurt as an outcome of oversight by those executing the therapy.

From 2008 to 2011, laser procedures executed by NPOs in clinical spas represented virtually 80% of the injury claims. Since that time, several other laser hair removal matches have been submitted. The organization suggests this treatment only be done by a skin doctor or plastic surgeon with considerable experience with these issues.

An expanding number of laser treatment injury lawsuits are being submitted in behalf of people that experienced burns and other severe issues during laser eye surgical procedures, laser hair removal and other aesthetic procedures. To read more concerning the lawful options readily available to victims of aesthetic laser surgical procedure injuries, please call Alonso Krangle LLP today to schedule your free legal testimonial.