Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Aesthetic Laser Treatment Injury Suits

From Randolph STEM
Revision as of 04:28, 28 April 2025 by NoeliaI38419 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The results of a research study designed to identify the incidence of physician liability cases coming from cutaneous laser surgical procedure carried out by nonphysician operators (NPOs") in the United States that was released online in the journal JAMA Dermatol on October 16, 2013 revealed a clear fad that demonstrates a dramatic rise in the variety of lawsuits associated with NPOs performance of laser surgical treatment." NPOs include nurse practitioners, registered n...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The results of a research study designed to identify the incidence of physician liability cases coming from cutaneous laser surgical procedure carried out by nonphysician operators (NPOs") in the United States that was released online in the journal JAMA Dermatol on October 16, 2013 revealed a clear fad that demonstrates a dramatic rise in the variety of lawsuits associated with NPOs performance of laser surgical treatment." NPOs include nurse practitioners, registered nurses, clinical aides, electrologists, and aestheticians. While only one-third of laser hair elimination treatments were executed by NPOs in 2012 (the continuing to be two-thirds were performed by doctors), 85.7% of the laser hair elimination legal actions from 2008 to 2012 involved NPOs (from 2004 to 2012, 75.5% of the laser hair removal lawsuits included a NPO; from 2010 to 2012, the percent was 90.0%).

Laser hair removal is the most typical laser procedure executed in the United States and was the most generally executed laser procedure based on injury claims (complied with by renewal insurance claims (which includes extreme pulses of light on the face) and injury claims involving laser therapies for marks and leg capillaries).

One of the earliest lawsuits was filed in 2001, when a female endured severe 2nd and third-degree burns as a result of the removal surgical procedure. Hair Facts suggests that those with darker or tanned skin are more likely to experience injury from these procedures.

From 2008 to 2011, laser treatments done by NPOs in clinical medspas represented virtually 80% of the injury legal actions. Since that time, lots of other can laser hair removal cause problems hair removal matches have been submitted. The company advises this treatment only be done by a skin doctor or cosmetic surgeon with substantial experience with these issues.

A growing variety of laser therapy injury claims are being filed on behalf of people that experienced burns and various other serious complications during laser eye surgical procedures, laser hair removal and other aesthetic procedures. To learn more regarding the lawful alternatives readily available to victims of aesthetic laser surgery injuries, please call Alonso Krangle LLP today to arrange your free lawful testimonial.