Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

A Growth Of Litigation

From Randolph STEM
Revision as of 21:32, 27 April 2025 by LouellaAlvardo4 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The results of a research study developed to determine the incidence of medical professional obligation insurance claims coming from cutaneous laser surgical procedure performed by nonphysician operators (NPOs") in the USA that was published online in the journal JAMA Dermatol on October 16, 2013 showed a clear trend that demonstrates a dramatic rise in the number of legal actions associated with NPOs performance of laser surgical procedure." NPOs include registered nurs...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The results of a research study developed to determine the incidence of medical professional obligation insurance claims coming from cutaneous laser surgical procedure performed by nonphysician operators (NPOs") in the USA that was published online in the journal JAMA Dermatol on October 16, 2013 showed a clear trend that demonstrates a dramatic rise in the number of legal actions associated with NPOs performance of laser surgical procedure." NPOs include registered nurse experts, signed up nurses, medical assistants, electrologists, and aestheticians. While only one-third of laser hair removal procedures were done by NPOs in 2012 (the staying two-thirds were done by physicians), 85.7% of the laser hair removal legal actions from 2008 to 2012 entailed NPOs (from 2004 to 2012, 75.5% of the laser hair removal legal actions included a NPO; from 2010 to 2012, the percentage was 90.0%).

In 2011, 90.9% (10 out of 11) of the laser hair elimination injury legal actions included NPOs, which the research study's authors interpret as reflecting that some intrinsic raised risk of injury exists with NPOs doing laser hair elimination treatments.

Even if the procedure is executed in a non-medical setup does not imply that it is any much less high-risk than treatments in a healthcare facility or surgical center. Actually, can laser hair removal cause problems hair elimination claims get on the increase, with suits submitted throughout the country in behalf of those seriously hurt as a result of carelessness by those doing the therapy.

From 2008 to 2011, laser treatments performed by NPOs in clinical spas stood for virtually 80% of the injury suits. Since that time, numerous other laser hair elimination matches have been submitted. The organization recommends this treatment only be executed by a dermatologist or cosmetic surgeon with significant experience with these issues.

An expanding number of laser therapy injury suits are being filed in support of individuals that experienced burns and other major issues during laser eye surgeries, laser hair removal and other aesthetic procedures. For more information about the legal options offered to sufferers of cosmetic laser surgery injuries, please call Alonso Krangle LLP today to schedule your totally free legal testimonial.